Search This Blog

Obama Moves Quickly: Successor For Scalia

CBS News Obama: I plan to nominate a successor to Justice Scalia. (**not in grave yet. then, Why?) And why won't tweet let us tweet this story? THIS STORY IS NOT OVER, (the deed is done!)
 Last Updated Feb 13, 2016 8:55 PM EST
President Obama commemorated deceased Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia Saturday evening but also promised to nominate a successor in due time, in spite of Republicans who are say that responsibility belongs to the next president.


Here's where the narcissism of sic Obama come in: "Obviously today is a time to remember Justice Scalia's legacy. I plan to fulfill my Constitutional responsibilities to nominate a successor in due time. There will be plenty of time for me to do so and for the Senate to fulfill its responsibility to give that person a fair hearing and a timely vote," Mr. Obama said. "These are responsibilities that I take seriously, (as should everyone.) more manipulative talk. They are bigger than any one party; they are about our democracy. They're about the institution to which Justice Scalia dedicated his professional life and making sure it continues to function as the beacon of justice that our founders  envisioned." (...manipulate and condescending to dummy as we'll need him/Savior to make our decision. We can't)
Capital Hill could not control Scalia. The Democrat's want a judge the can control.
Uncover: "The Why's"? Checking the Supreme Court's pending decisions.
One, was on abortion, which could be large profits in selling baby parts, shipped into other countries as (experiments), genetics, DNA i.e.), and, was he too much a champion to the following of the constitution of the United States?


Scalia, one of the court's conservative members, was found dead on Saturday.
In his remarks, Mr. Obama called Scalia a "larger than life presence on the bench" and a "brilliant legal mind with an energetic style, an incisive wit and colorful opinions."


"He influenced a generation of judges, layers and students and profoundly shaped the legal landscape," Mr. Obama added, saying he will be one of the "most consequential justices and thinkers to serve on the Supreme Court."



Their plot thickens: With Scalia's death, conservatives lose their 5-4 majority in the Supreme Court. If Mr. Obama were to successfully nominate the next justice, he could tip the balance of power back into the "liberals' " hands. Now "who" could that be?


Earlier in the day, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, said believes the Senate should wait 11 months for the next president to be sworn in before confirming a Supreme Court justice to replace Scalia. Who's behind the invitation to the ranch? (Why was Scalia there by whom, + what party i.e.?) A name keep popping and covered.


 The wicked witch enters: But Hillary Clinton, who is running to succeed Mr. Obama as president, said in a statement that Republicans who are calling for the seat to remain vacant "dishonor our Constitution." (Manipulative talk) When has Obamaaa considered the peoples constitutional rights?
McConnell throws down the gauntlet: No Scalia replacement under Obama

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/mitch-mcconnell-antonin-scalia-supreme-court-nomination-219248#ixzz40Iaoch8V


"The Senate has a constitutional responsibility here that it cannot abdicate for partisan political reasons," she said.
Mr. Obama also ordered flags to be flown at half staff **until Scalia is interred.


TV:  2-15-2016: Inside Edition reported Scalia was found with a pillow over his head at a ranch he was staying at. 
Scalia was a threat to Obama's power, (Democrat's power.) While he may have been murdered the move is needed to quickly get it back by appointing one of their own in his stead. Why waste a good murder?
...........................................
Another reports:
Source: Washington Post
The sudden death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia on Saturday has some conspiracy theorists wondering if the polarizing juror truly died of natural causes.
As the circumstances of his death reached the media, researchers began noting numerous suspicious details which, they believe, suggest that a conspiracy to eliminate Scalia may have been afoot.
While U.S. Marshals who investigated the scene determined that there was no foul play, one expert argued that these officials would not have had the training to make that determination, particularly if Scalia had been poisoned.
The fact that no autopsy was ordered by the justice of the peace and that Scalia's family also decided to forgo such an examination has conspiracy theorists crying foul and alleging that this is being done to cover something up.
Additionally, they point to conflicting reports over the exact nature of the heart issue which caused Scalia's death as possible evidence that the 'powers that be' are crafting a narrative which will be plausible to the public.
That Scalia opted not to have a security detail while in Texas is yet another worrisome element of the story cited by researchers.
Poindexter and Obam..
Vietnam together?

And a news report which revealed that Scalia was found with a pillow over his head has further fueled skepticism surrounding his unexpected demise. 
Unfortunately, history has shown that if the late Supreme Court Justice was murdered it is highly unlikely his assassins will pay for the crime.
Although further insight into Scalia's medical condition should help dispel suspicions surrounding his death, it is almost certain that the strange demise of such a powerful figure in American politics will forever have a place in conspiracy lore regardless of any new information which may come to light.





No comments: